Roget's ‘Palisade’ Illusion

from Michael’s   Visual Phenomena & Optical Illusions


What to do & see


Peter Mark Roget (1779–1869), author of the eponymous thesaurus, first described this illusion, hence known as the “Roget” or “Palisade” illusion.

His own explanation is not convincing from our current understanding. Essentially it is a sampling proplem. Carpenter detailed a geometrical derivation in 1868, which was recently formalized by James Hunt (2003). The intersections of gaps and spokes over time indeed form curves. Due to the afterimage (“persistance of vision”) our perception connects these and we perceive the illusionary shape.

Note added 2009-04: Interestingly, this effect can also occur in “finish photos” of bike racing, where the spatio-temporal intricacies of the camera shutter “bend the spikes” – and quite strongly too. Furthermore, the Palisade illusion probably also causes an interesting shape distortion in archery, when capturing the string release with a photo just at the right time. Beautiful things can be learned from the web!

Note 2014-04: While looking for examples of aliasing, I noted the strong Palisade illution in a helicopter movie. I assume the video-chip sampling runs from top to bottom, and the rotor has different positions during that time.

Note 2014-12: The same mechanism underlies the “rolling shutter effect” which has its own Widipedia entry.

Note 2019-08-07: Dennis Couzin suggested, quite rightly, that the motion had been much too slow; now corrected.


James L Hunt for pointing me to this illusion and providing material.

Roget PM (1825) Explanation of an Optical Deception in the Appearance of the Spokes of a Wheel Seen through Vertical Apertures. Phil Trans Royal Soc London 115:131–140

Carpenter WB (1868) On the Zoetrope and its antecedents. The Student and Intellectual Observer 1:427–444

Hunt JL (2003) The Roget Illusion, the Anorthoscope and the persistence of vision. Am J Phys 71:774–777

Wade NJ, Heller D (2003) Visual motion illusions, eye movements, and the search for objectivity. J Hist Neurosci 12:376–395